They don't even take the word of Harvard as left enough to be "credible" in their eyes?The Annoyed Man wrote: ↑Tue Oct 02, 2018 9:20 am I have no problem with the article itself, but I wish they provided a direct link to the Harvard study itself. The problem is, I like to use social media to distribute information like this, and the naysayers will point to the fact that the article makes “claims” about the data without providing a link TO that data. Without that link, it’s easy for gun grabbers on Twitter to dispute the results, accusing belief.net of twisting the data to their own meaning. They are hardly a disinterested observer.
