tbranch wrote:LedJedi wrote:I'm not going to get into the legality of size, contrast or placement as to me it's almost irrelevant.
I don't have a problem with the rights of private business or property owners. They do have the right to control their property.
30.06 tells them how to go about enforcing that right. If not, someone could argue that a tiny ghostbuster sign was effective notice. The law allows owners to exercise their right to control of their property while protecting CHLs.
There is no almost sign. It either complies or it does not. If the sign is correct, I will comply and either leave my weapon in the car or do business elsewhere. If not, I was not properly notified and will act accordingly.
Tom
I don't want to be the "test case" on this issue but I like your thinking, Tom.
