Yes. IMHOClutch wrote:Look under GC §411.172 Eligability section 11.This allows for state taxes collected by the comptroller, not federal taxes. Since Texas doesn't have state taxes and I have not been found "finally determined to be delinquent", it shouldn't have bearing...(11) has not been finally determined to be delinquent in the payment of a tax or other money collected by the comptroller, the tax collector of a political subdivision of the state, or any agency or subdivision of the state;
Am I reading this right?
Search found 3 matches
Return to “May 2010 Applications”
- Sat Jun 26, 2010 6:09 pm
- Forum: The "Waiting Room"
- Topic: May 2010 Applications
- Replies: 223
- Views: 38625
Re: May 2010 Applications
- Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:02 pm
- Forum: The "Waiting Room"
- Topic: May 2010 Applications
- Replies: 223
- Views: 38625
Re: May 2010 Applications
When you consider how long both new and renewal applications were taking last year, that's not bad.
At that time, Charles was collecting information on how long the process was taking and conveyed that information to the appropriate people at DPS and the state House of Representatives. That led to the recent improvement in processing times.
I know, it doesn't make YOU feel any better.
At that time, Charles was collecting information on how long the process was taking and conveyed that information to the appropriate people at DPS and the state House of Representatives. That led to the recent improvement in processing times.
I know, it doesn't make YOU feel any better.
- Wed Jun 16, 2010 11:04 am
- Forum: The "Waiting Room"
- Topic: May 2010 Applications
- Replies: 223
- Views: 38625
Re: May 2010 Applications
Probably has to go through Dallas and Houston first. Maybe somebody put it on the wrong truck.manrique0908 wrote:what the heck! How can a package from MA take less time to get to San Antonio than a letter from Austin?????????