TexasCHLforum.com

frankie_the_yankee wrote:

seeker_two wrote:

frankie_the_yankee wrote: If Satan is the major party opponent of the Democrat, don't stay home, don't vote for the Slow Wheat ticket. Vote for Satan.

I've seen this sentiment posted by several here.....just remember....those who are willing to put their faith in Satan's side are destined for far worse a fate than just losing an election....

I think I'll vote for a candidate that DOESN'T have much in common with the Prince of Darkness, thank you very much....

Just keep in mind that there is such a thing as heck on Earth too.

And if Hillary/Obama gets elected president, you'll be reminded of it real fast.

Hence, the "Prince of Darkness" remark....

DoubleJ wrote:I'm of the opinion that if the idealistic approach doesn't work in the primaries, vote for satan in the biggie

Isn't that special?.....

frankie_the_yankee wrote: If Satan is the major party opponent of the Democrat, don't stay home, don't vote for the Slow Wheat ticket. Vote for Satan.

I've seen this sentiment posted by several here.....just remember....those who are willing to put their faith in Satan's side are destined for far worse a fate than just losing an election....

I think I'll vote for a candidate that DOESN'T have much in common with the Prince of Darkness, thank you very much....

Trainman wrote:My fear and apprehension that the future integrity of the 2nd ammendment will be eroded and that more gun control initiatives and laws will be enacted -
has just been verified.

....only if you vote for a "winner"....

Trainman wrote:

If you want to vote for the candidate that represents your views, vote for the candidate that represents your views--whatever party or "chance of winning" that may be......

A philosophy built upon idealism.

The practical use of that ideal can be viewed historically when Ross Perot was a third party candidate in 92 and 96. Because of that, this country had 8 years of Bill Clinton.

That is what strict idealism will bring.

Ideological goals are great - until the parties have chosen their candidates. Then you have to decide if you want to win, or be a loser.

http://www.lonestarpark.com/

Need directions?...

If you want to pick a winner on Election Day, go to the horse races.....

If you want to vote for the candidate that represents your views, vote for the candidate that represents your views--whatever party or "chance of winning" that may be......

Why would Rudy be worse than Hillary as President? Simple....the President is typically considered the head of the party they represent....

If Hillary is elected, then she'll control the Democrat Party. We know she's an anti-2A liberal & will push her party to vote for the anti 2-A liberal agenda that they probably would vote for anyway.....

If Rudy is elected, then he'll control the Republican party. We know he's an anti-2A liberal. He'll put even the most conservative 2A representatives in a position where they have to vote for Rudy's anti-2A policies or stand against their own party--and risk losing party support (ie MONEY) in their reelection bids. And many of them WILL cave---look at Kay Bailey Hutchison. Meanwhile, the Democrats will vote for the anti-2A policies Rudy supports and try to claim credit for them.

Rudy is far more dangerous than Hillary....so much so that, if he's the GOP nominee, I will be voting for a third-party candidate who's platform most closely represents my views..... http://www.constitutionparty.org

Like the knight in Indy 3....Choose wisely.....