The article is quite misleading in that they claim 46.02 is being misapplied to prohibit bikers from "possessing" firearms and suggesting that it has been applied to bikers with LTC's, without providing any examples. 46.02 prohibits CARRYING of weapons (specifically handguns), not possession. Second, the example that they give was of a biker carrying in their car, not merely possessing. And apparently the defense did not raise this exception of having a LTC. Presumably either the biker didn't have one or has a very bad lawyer. I read the MPP article previously on another site and the other MPP articles linked there. None provided anything other than allegations that this was occurring.nimravus01 wrote: ↑Wed Oct 03, 2018 12:56 am Here is another perspectice on the subject:
http://www.motorcycleprofilingproject.c ... rm-bikers/
I'm not sure I agree with the aspect of 46.02 that disallows vehicle carry by "criminal street gang" members when no formal adjudication of such status has ever been made. But that is the law as it currently stands. It is a lot different than saying that all Bandidos Club Members are prohibited from "possessing" firearms.