The better question is what would he be charged with for carrying the Glock in accordance with MPA.C-dub wrote:I do not believe that this 17y old minor can legally possess any firearm as part of the MPA or any other law. Wait until he turns 18y then it is much different.
Not 46.02 Unlawful Carrying of a Weapon...nothing about age in there.
Dad wouldn't be charged with "PC §46.13. MAKING A FIREARM ACCESSIBLE TO A CHILD." Because in that statute someone 17 is not defined a "child".
Federal law has to do with "transferring" a handgun to someone under 18 and has exception with parental permission (if federal law even applies to possession).