I don't. Even the TCLEOSE training is a joke. I have yet to see the training requirement in the 2nd amendment. How come I can buy and carry an AR15 at 18 without any required training? Shouldn't we require everyone buying a gun to take training in that specific firearm and then register the gun to their license so we know they are proficient? That way they (presumably) wouldn't sweep me/us the range.LaUser wrote:I agree. There is not enough training. What we currently have is a joke. There should be more classroom time, safety handling training and yearly range qualification.TVGuy wrote:Negative, no handling skills were taught.
I know I'm going to get hardcore flamed on this, but I don't think there is nearly enough training. Yes, it is your right to carry. The safety and proficiency levels of MANY people with CHLs is extremely low.
I've been to renewal classes (when that was still around) that multiple people had not fired their weapon since the last CHL proficiency test. That's completely irresponsible. I hate to say it, but I think there are more of those than people who go out even every six months...which is still not enough.
Years ago on another forum, someone was complaining because he could not carry like LEO's do. Among other things, like extensive training and retraining, they are required to qualify at the range yearly, at least where I come from. I think if you want to carry a pistol, you have to show proficiency on a yearly basis. LEOSA requires this.
I'm special, I'm military trained in M14 and M16 rifle, .45 pistol, and M60 LMG. I really don't know what all these 22 year old college girl wannabe SEAL/SWAT people are doing with CHL's. Only highly trained tacticool professionals like me should have a CHL. I also think there should be a fitness test, 20 pull ups, 80 situps (in 2min), and run 3 miles in 22 min.