Search found 2 matches
Return to “Discharged "under honorable conditions" = not "honorably"”
- Wed Apr 22, 2015 3:26 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Discharged "under honorable conditions" = not "honorably"
- Replies: 193
- Views: 52365
Re: Discharged "under honorable conditions" = not "honorably
In my service no combat. My DD-214 says Honorable. I was the first man in my family to serve... I am proud of my service.
- Mon Apr 13, 2015 6:54 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Discharged "under honorable conditions" = not "honorably"
- Replies: 193
- Views: 52365
Re: Discharged "under honorable conditions" = not "honorably
I'm wondering is it restricted to FOIA requests? If so, what exemption to FOIA? I'm thinking they'll cite privacy as entities may use categorizations to discriminate against individual veterans beyond the mere "categorization" of their discharge.E.Marquez wrote:Im not arguing with anyone...mojo84 wrote:I'm not arguing with you.
Here are the current ones per militarypay.defense.gov
I simply said, the AR is restricted, it is not publicly made available. That some member of a military service or Gov worker decided to publish that section of the reg is not surprising at all.
Once the news broke (well before my time in the service ) mid 1970's...Most service members i know are aware of the SPD code, and know exactly what is on the DD214.
When I processed out in 2014 i was shown the SPD on my DD214, and shown in the reg what it represented. Seemed a pretty standard procedure then.. For sure it was not in 1970...but that was then, this is now.
ScottDLS = NAVY, HONORABLE, FBK
