Search found 1 match

by ScottDLS
Mon Jun 16, 2014 1:43 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: Does this meet the legal requirements ?
Replies: 28
Views: 3415

Re: Does this meet the legal requirements ?

The statute defines "notice". It is very specific. And then it requires that the person "received notice" and continued to remain on the property/premises to be guilty of the offense. If someone is to be prosecuted, presumably one needs to be proven to have committed the acts proscribed, "beyond a reasonable doubt". It is a relatively major criminal offense (Class A misdemeanor), and thus deserves this protection. If I inadvertently pass a 30.06 notice, whether properly or much more likely IMPROPERLY posted, that would be my defense. I don't seek to break the law, I always seek to comply with it. In the very unlikely situation that I was discovered carrying concealed, my defense would be that I had not received notice. i.e. the truth would be my defense. That's all we can do. There are undoubtedly people convicted who are not guilty, however I still believe that it is relatively rare and will conduct my affairs in view of that...

-Scott :rules:

Return to “Does this meet the legal requirements ?”