The Annoyed Man wrote:Frankly, I don't either. BUT... at least a Republican candidate, even a RINO candidate, has to pay lip service to conservative ideals, while the Democrat candidate is under no such obligation. I understand your attraction to Ron Paul, but how are you going to vote if he doesn't win the nomination?anygunanywhere wrote:I see no difference in the liberal Rinos and Dems.
OK, so we elect a liberal RINO that get the republicans to vote with the liberals? So elect McCain so he can expand McCain Feingold and expand his views on gun control including background checks on EVERY gun sale, including private? So elect Romney so he can spread his form of gun safety that he passed in MA? You do realize that he supports the AWB and said that if it came to his desk, he would sign it as POTUS? Every candidate wants to expand the Federal Government except Paul, so my view is, voting for any other candidate then Paul is a vote for same damn thing we've been getting.
BTW, I'd probably vote Libertarian or the Constitution Party if Paul is not on the ticket. McCain/Romney/Obama/Hillary, it's all the same.
Actually, Obama is probably the safe bet because you actually know where he stands and hasn't wavered from his Liberal standpoint. At least we be getting stabbed in the chest instead of in the back from Romney or McCain.
