Or reasonably should have seen. If it meets the requirements, you should have seen it!Kalrog wrote:So if you see a sign anywhere on the property that meets the legal requirements, then you have been notified.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Austin TX: Alamo Drafthouse Lake Creek (update, signs gone)”
- Thu Dec 20, 2007 2:27 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Austin TX: Alamo Drafthouse Lake Creek (update, signs gone)
- Replies: 67
- Views: 10644
Re: Austin TX: Alamo Drafthouse Lake Creek does now allow CCW
- Mon Dec 17, 2007 3:24 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Austin TX: Alamo Drafthouse Lake Creek (update, signs gone)
- Replies: 67
- Views: 10644
Re: Austin TX: Alamo Drafthouse Lake Creek does now allow CCW
I agree with Kalrog. I respect that the manager gave an honest answer (it's private property, it's my legal right, it's my decision, I made the decision for our business). No dancing around trying to please everyone with a one size fits all but not compeletely true answer. Do I agree that is the best decision for her business? No, but it is her business to run.
The one thing I don't understand is she clearly went to the trouble to get the compliant wording, she references the DPS site (Q&A) where the 1" requirement is described, so why didn't she put up a compliant sign? We all agree the sign isn't compliant (you still make take the ride, but that is another discussion), but why be so upfront about your intent and decision, get the wording in both languages and then miss the size requirement that is clearly in the document you reference?
The one thing I don't understand is she clearly went to the trouble to get the compliant wording, she references the DPS site (Q&A) where the 1" requirement is described, so why didn't she put up a compliant sign? We all agree the sign isn't compliant (you still make take the ride, but that is another discussion), but why be so upfront about your intent and decision, get the wording in both languages and then miss the size requirement that is clearly in the document you reference?