The definition of amusement park is that the place must have "amusement rides." So if the zoo has one little kids train, that makes it an amusement park? Or wasn't the law intended to mean Astroworld, Six Flags, etc. which is built around rides?
And yes, I know that Astroworld isn't there anymore.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “30.06 Ruling Letters”
- Tue Apr 05, 2016 12:22 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: 30.06 Ruling Letters
- Replies: 229
- Views: 88472
- Tue Apr 05, 2016 10:56 am
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: 30.06 Ruling Letters
- Replies: 229
- Views: 88472
Re: 30.06 Ruling Letters
The Dallas Zoo is owned by the city. They make the outlandish claim that they contract with someone else to operate the facility, and the operator claims to be an amusement park. It is still city property. Or doesn't the AG realize that?
As a previous poster mentioned, a very few letters in all of these months, and some of them came after the offending signs were already taken down. Hard working public officials. Maybe if Paxton goes to jail on his pending charges we will get a real AG.
As a previous poster mentioned, a very few letters in all of these months, and some of them came after the offending signs were already taken down. Hard working public officials. Maybe if Paxton goes to jail on his pending charges we will get a real AG.