TexasCHLforum.com

Papa_Tiger wrote: ↑Sat Jul 06, 2019 1:01 pm

narcissist wrote: ↑Sat Jul 06, 2019 12:30 pm

Really, if you were that proficient, you should be able to stop them with a single shot. Anything more than that is "over kill".

In a way I guess you could be right, wonder if you would only shoot someone only one time in a life threatening situation. I hear of cops shooting people a lot more then one time and my understanding is they are well trained and "proficient". There would at least be no proof of my training unlike the police so it could always be looked at a little different. Plus it really all depends how much money you have and how good of a attorney you can afford besides age, sex, evidence also your status in the county in which you reside---> to much to list. District Attorneys always want to try every trick in the book to get the highest conviction rate no matter what so its possible. Guess two in the chest and one in the head would be enough

This may be misinterpreted by people in a bad way. If you empty say 16 rounds into someone even though let's say there's video evidence of him attacking you with a knife. Even if you have stab wounds the D.A. will no matter what try his hardest for Death Penalty. Due to what's called "Over Kill". I say practice enough to shoot them two in the chest and then two in the head with proficinency, The threat should be eliminated at that point if for some strange reason not use the necessary force needed.