TexasCHLforum.com

Dragonfighter wrote:

Abraham wrote:Fair enough.

I do think many take the position that possessing a CHL obligates them beyond the boundaries of what they're about, if that makes any sense...?

<SNIP>

I was who I am and do what I do long before CHL's. It is only that there is another tool and another option to carry out the actions and choices I have made since the CHL.

Very correct DragonFighter. I teach in class that a gun on you hip will not change your character. Adversities do not build character, they reveal it.
The young man from AutoZone revealed his character.
So have several through this thread.
Several yrs ago, Clinton era, I was standing in a group of men just listening to the discussion. It was about what folks would do to defend the Nation after the ban & then confiscation. An older Veteran finally interrupted them & said something like, you will find out who the real men are because they will come out of the woods w/ ax handles if that is all they have to fight with.
I did not say anything then & never have to him. I have made a point to visit him pretty regular though.

Abraham,
You have basically stated that you will not get involved in a 3rd party force or deadly force to protect any life other than yours or your family even if the 3rd party is about to be killed.

That is your choice & it is legal for you to make it. The moral ethics of your position has now been challenged w/ good arguments.

No one has said you or any one should get involved in a domestic slapping or the like.

Stop streatching or mis-stating the facts or be willing to have others state them correctly.
LT

We have had WAY too many threads drift lately.

Lets leave UPS, Intel, and Levi's out of this one please.