anygunanywhere wrote:Ya'll are pig rasslin'.
Anygunanywhere
You have summed it up very well.
Will try this again.
LOCKED
Return to “Failure to Conceal?”
anygunanywhere wrote:Ya'll are pig rasslin'.
Anygunanywhere
That is bound to be the fault in this thread. It is very evident that his self evaluation makes him way smarter than Charles & Steve both put together.Keith B wrote:Maybe if you're dyslexic it affects the way you are reading the law and failing to get the proper comprehension?Longshot38 wrote:I'm glad you find my dyslexia so amusing seeing as I have so much control over that.Songbird wrote:I know I'm going to regret this. Can't stand it any longer though. I've been reading this thread all day. One would think that a person who is such an authority on the laws of our fine State would know the difference between "then" and "than", and would understand VERY basic sentence structure.Longshot38 wrote:You might be a fine attorney who wrote TPC 46 but there is more to the Penal Code then that. And I can promise you that in real world practical application of the law you are dead wrong, I know this because I live it everyday. And I will stand behind what I have said to the point being the first test case. I am confident in this because no officer would charge me, no TX DA would accept the charges, and no jury would convict me. In the world outside the pages of the TPC your argument has no merit.
Sorry. I had to do it.