Written and oral are two different things.SCone wrote:The biggest trouble with the way the law is written is in the word "oral". This one word gives the owner (or their rep) the authority to simply say, "No firearms allowed". And we, being the law-abiding folks we are, must then depart or be subject to trespassing. This is true whether there is a "legal" 30.06 sign or not.
This section troubled me in my CHL class and it still gives me cause for concern.
As far as the 30.06 wording within the employee manual, that is not required to be enforced. You are an employee, not a visitor. Since you are an employee of the company you agreed to certain requirements to be employed. Non-disclosure of company secrets, network use policies & more than likely, that you have read & agree to follow company policies stated in the employee manual.
This would more than qualify as meeting the "oral" part of the law.
If it's "written communication" and doesn't meet the requirements in the law, then violating company policy is not against the law. To use your example, maybe they can fire me but they can't throw me in jail for sending my friend a personal email from work.