TexasCHLforum.com

driver8 wrote:I would sure like to hear Charles' opinion on this.

He gives one heck of a presentation on the subject, occasionally.

The Annoyed Man wrote:Furthermore, paraphrasing Section 9.32, "I am justified in using deadly force against mongo if I would be justified in using [any kind of] force against mongo under Section 9.31."

How does that sound?

It sounds like you missed an "and" in 9.32. You're justified in using deadly force if you're justified in using force and one or more additional conditions apply.

For example, I think you're justified in using force, but not deadly force, to stop a two year old from kicking you in the shins.