46.035 (i) Subsections (b)(4), (b)(5), (b)(6), and (c) do not apply if the actor was not given effective notice under Section 30.06.Rhino1 wrote:What did I miss in my CHL class?
Search found 3 matches
Return to “What about reducing non-carry locations?”
- Sun Dec 28, 2008 10:40 pm
- Forum: 2009 Texas Legislative Session
- Topic: What about reducing non-carry locations?
- Replies: 26
- Views: 3675
Re: What about reducing non-carry locations?
- Fri Dec 19, 2008 3:50 pm
- Forum: 2009 Texas Legislative Session
- Topic: What about reducing non-carry locations?
- Replies: 26
- Views: 3675
Re: What about reducing non-carry locations?
"Section 46.02 does not apply to a person who"CJATE wrote:I agree with you, Bars are tough. I do feel employees should be alowed.
"holds an alcoholic beverage permit or license or is an employee of a holder of an alcoholic beverage permit or license if the person is supervising the operation of the permitted or licensed premises"
- Fri Dec 19, 2008 2:02 pm
- Forum: 2009 Texas Legislative Session
- Topic: What about reducing non-carry locations?
- Replies: 26
- Views: 3675
Re: What about reducing non-carry locations?
If we compromise and keep the rule against carrying while intoxicated that should satisfy rational people.Charles L. Cotton wrote:As a heads-up for people, bars are going to be the biggest rallying point for the opposition. The media will have a field day with "CHLs getting drunk in bars" and this will put a lot of pressure on House Members and Senators.
What can we do to show the House Members and Senators and the public that the media fearmongers are irrational and liars?