I disagree. If they violate the sheep's rights (enforce unconstitutional laws) they are wolves or feral dogs, not beneficial sheepdogs.Kerbouchard wrote:By taking the teeth from the sheepdog, you aren't protecting the sheepdog or the sheep. You're turning the sheep and the sheepdog over to the wolves.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Gun manufacturers continue to aid gun banners”
- Fri Jun 06, 2008 5:05 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Gun manufacturers continue to aid gun banners
- Replies: 30
- Views: 3456
Re: Gun manufacturers continue to aid gun banners
- Fri Jun 06, 2008 5:00 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Gun manufacturers continue to aid gun banners
- Replies: 30
- Views: 3456
Re: Gun manufacturers continue to aid gun banners
That requires there to be no law enforcement exceptions, exemptions, loopholes or similar manure.flintknapper wrote:Not exactly. The premise is this: Once firearms are no longer obtainable (by police, by military, by swat teams, by civilians, or anyone) it will cause such an uproar...that CA lawmakers will be "forced" to change their laws.