Search found 2 matches

by BSHII
Wed Sep 02, 2020 9:33 am
Forum: Off-Topic
Topic: 2016: Deplorables 2020: Enemies of the state
Replies: 17
Views: 4267

Re: 2016: Deplorables 2020: Enemies of the state

Grayling813 wrote: Tue Aug 25, 2020 11:57 am Those of us who are not in lockstep with the Socialist Democrat Party are being called names again.
In 2016 Candidate Clinton called us deplorables. In 2020 Speaker of the House Pelosi declares us enemies of the state.

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/elliebufk ... s-n2574955
The Democrats have gone full Bolshevik, so the "enemies of the state" language fits.
by BSHII
Wed Sep 02, 2020 9:32 am
Forum: Off-Topic
Topic: 2016: Deplorables 2020: Enemies of the state
Replies: 17
Views: 4267

Re: 2016: Deplorables 2020: Enemies of the state

The Annoyed Man wrote: Wed Sep 02, 2020 7:06 am Nancy Pelosi caught on business security camera violating California law shuttering hair salons, without wearing a mask:



Politico's reporting on it: did the salon break California law by videotaping someone without their consent? You can’t make this kind of comedy gold up.

The answer to the second Tweeter's question is "Yes," of course. California law only requires two-party consent to record confidential communications. A "confidential communication" is "any communication carried on in circumstances as may reasonably indicate that any party to the communication desires it to be confined to the parties thereto, but excludes a communication made in a public gathering . . . or in any other circumstance in which the parties to the communication may reasonably expect that the communication may be overheard or recorded." Walking around in someone else's business is not a "confidential communication," and a business owner certainly does not need guests' consent to record surveillance footage in her own business.

Return to “2016: Deplorables 2020: Enemies of the state”