I did skim through the entire document and in general agree... I don't think something like this will transpire without a severe economic dislocation that causes the Fed.Gov to be unable to respond everywhere it's needed. What might cause such an event is open to conjecture.bblhd672 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 02, 2018 11:01 pmI quit reading at this paragraph. Attacking our host isn’t cool. Your lengthy essay could have stood on its own without the above paragraph throwing down a gauntlet daring a response from the site owner.PriestTheRunner wrote: ↑Sun Sep 02, 2018 7:01 pm Now, I know Charles may ban me for this or delete this thread, but if he chooses to do so (and that would be his right), but that would make this forum no better than the likes of Facebook, Twitter, Google and others who are silencing public (appropriate) speech in a public venue. I certainly wouldn't consider this thread as yelling "fire" in a crowded theater, and it certainly doesn't stoop to the revolting levels of some speech that has been deemed 'protected'. I believe we need to have a discussion on Texit and we need to have it now, despite what those 'on the other side' may see or think when they watch this forum. I don't want us to stoop as low as the left. Dozens on here have decried such actions from facebook, it would be a shame if we repeated them. Though, if Charles wants to remove this from texaschlforum, it would be his right.
In regards to this site, Charles as the Owner and host, I think you were rude and antagonistic. It's been made clear that this is not a site for hashing over and stirring up political issues. The focus is on the concealed carry and IMO, a great deal of leeway is allowed. That said, I'm surprised the post was left for discussion. Despite having some strong feelings about the state of our once Nation, I'll continue to respect this forum and not go down that road.
Just my opinion....
Jeff B.