BBYC wrote: ↑Tue Jun 12, 2018 1:03 pm
The Annoyed Man wrote: ↑Tue Jun 12, 2018 11:55 am
What Middle Age Russ says about the limits where one’s rights bump up against the rights of another make absolute sense, and to a large extent, I agree with that sentiment.
I agree and to be clear, I don't consider a property owner who bans guns a "bad guy" any more than a property owner who bans dogs. A person has the right to prohibit dogs or guns in their home I respect their private property rights as an individual, even if I don't agree with their decision.
However, a public accommodation is required to allow dogs, if the dogs are service animals. Using a similar standard, they should be required to allow guns, if the guns are carried by someone licensed to carry. That is consistent with established precedent for civil rights.
Well said.