Search found 6 matches

by Rafe
Mon Aug 15, 2022 10:25 am
Forum: Off-Topic
Topic: House GOP Pledges Investigation Of DoJ With November Win After FBI Raids Trump's Mar-A-Lago
Replies: 51
Views: 10487

Re: House GOP Pledges Investigation Of DoJ With November Win After FBI Raids Trump's Mar-A-Lago

srothstein wrote: Sun Aug 14, 2022 1:51 pm This means there was no real legal justification for the search warrant. So, I think it was done more for political reasons and I doubt those reasons had to do with January 6th. Both this whole warrant show and the on-going January 6th circus are more, IMO, to do with discrediting Trump in case he runs again. They are deathly afraid of him getting in office again and wanted to scare him off and convince voters he is a criminal to stop them for voting for him. Ironically, I think their ploy backfired on them and convinced him to run again when he was going to not run and instead play kingmaker and support Desantis.

As I type that, a Machiavellian thought came to mind. Maybe that is what they wanted after all. They know they could not beat Desantis but they think they can beat him by convincing independents he is crooked. That is a weird thought, but possible. Either way, I believe it had more to do with the next presidential election (with a little benefit to the mid-terms thrown in) than any real crime.
I wholeheartedly agree. But I don't know if I can ascribe enough strategic depth to the dem machinery to believe them thinking four moves ahead of the game. Maybe that's naïve. But so, so much of what come out of the current administration seems to be committee-driven (e.g., inconsistent and slow to materialize) and almost purely reactionary. For just about every major factor I think of since January 2021, nothing has really been proactive and when lip-service was given to decisions as if they were proactive, they've always proven to be wrong, from Afghanistan to energy to inflation.

Occam's razor, the simplest explanation I can think of is deflection. I fully believe history will eventually judge 2021 and 2022 to be the worst first years' performance of any presidential administration since Warren G. Harding, maybe since Andrew Johnson. And right now, it's all about the midterms. I think the dem strategists are grasping at anything and everything they can use to deflect news cycles away from Biden and the dem Congress and onto Republicans. We had the short-lived but passionately orated "Ultra-MAGA" spiel; the blame for America's inflation and lack of energy planning set squarely on Vladimir Putin; the failed attempt to make the Jan 6 showboat hearings into a prime-time network TV event (and that failure is likely to get RINO Liz Cheney out of office: independent, in-state Wyoming polls show the Republican challenger leading Cheney by a whopping 52% to 30%); the dem rallying cry for pro-life demonstrations and the stalking of justices after the SCOTUS ruling on Roe v. Wade; the immediate capitalization of the Uvalde tragedy by ramping anti-gun rhetoric and a rushing a ridiculous, unconstitutional bill through the House; and on and on. The Biden administration has not one single time stepped up and admitted a mistake, much less done anything credible and proactive to help the American people...help them right now. Sorry, Mr. President, even your own economists say that the continued overspending in the "Inflation Reduction Act" (aka "Build Back Better v2.0") is likely to reduce inflation by only 0.3% and that only starting in 2024.

We're only 85 days to the midterm elections. Twelve short weeks. The dem strategic machine milked the Jan 6 hearings, but those have gone stale, big time. They're seeing atrocious poll numbers for Biden. Most of their reliable core are already saying they definitely don't want Biden to run again. Candidates in the midterms are mostly avoiding his endorsement and are going out of their way not to appear with him. The administration is letting as many undocumented aliens through the southern border as they can get away with, but that won't help in the immediate midterms. In fact, gasp!, polling of Hispanic voters is showing many are as critical as Republicans of how the dems are handling things.

What to do? Whatever to do? Well, there's always their favorite punching bag. "Let's do something radical to get Trump back in the spotlight, stir-up and foment that hate that helped us put the WD-40 on the 2020 election. I know! Let's raid Mar-a-Lago! That'll capture the news bigtime! And maybe Trump will get noisy again and make more woke enemies!"

I may be wrong, but other than political blowback on the DOJ if the dems get shellacked in the midterms (and the White House can still protect them to a degree there) I don't think there is any legal liability on Garland or the DOJ for getting and prosecuting the warrant. So long as the affidavit provided something that looked like reasonable cause to the very biased judge who signed it, it's all on the up and up...even if it's the first time in history that it's ever been done against a FPOTUS. Big-time news splash that will stay in the news for weeks--and only 12 weeks until the midterms--to shift focus onto Donald "Democrat Punching Bag" Trump and away from the incompetent, incapable, ineffectual, and inept democrat leadership of the last 19 months.
by Rafe
Sat Aug 13, 2022 12:01 am
Forum: Off-Topic
Topic: House GOP Pledges Investigation Of DoJ With November Win After FBI Raids Trump's Mar-A-Lago
Replies: 51
Views: 10487

Re: House GOP Pledges Investigation Of DoJ With November Win After FBI Raids Trump's Mar-A-Lago

Thanks for the link. It seems that, unfortunately, the judge who executed the warrant, Bruce Reinhart, immediately started receiving threats that included anti-Semitic language.

Reinhart brings some baggage with him, though, to be the first judge to ever sign a search warrant served on a former President: https://heavy.com/news/judge-bruce-reinhart/. In part, he previously recused himself from Trump's lawsuit against Hillary Clinton and other dems over the Russia-Russia investigation because he didn't think he could be impartial. Signing a search warrant is a very different thing, but still...

He seems to be a lifelong democrat, was an Obama supporter and donor, and after moving to Florida--as a dem, mind you--contributed to Jeb Bush's run for the 2016 Republican nomination, presumably just to prevent Trump from getting it. He's also publicly insulted Trump on Facebook and, after moving to Florida, wrote in 2017, "It's embarrassing to live in a state that is less enlightened on criminal justice than Louisiana and Mississippi." I'm sure his fellow Floridian's appreciated that. As a topper:
The Miami Herald, in an investigation on Epstein, reported that a day after Reinhart resigned as a federal prosecutor, he began working as a defense attorney for employees of Epstein, including pilots and a scheduler. He was later accused in a lawsuit of violating Justice Department policies as a result...
Both he and his wife previously worked for the Department of Justice. I'm not sayin' he's an on-call state judge for the DOJ but, again given the historic nature of this warrant, I gotta say the optics look a bit, er, iffy.
by Rafe
Fri Aug 12, 2022 3:13 pm
Forum: Off-Topic
Topic: House GOP Pledges Investigation Of DoJ With November Win After FBI Raids Trump's Mar-A-Lago
Replies: 51
Views: 10487

Re: House GOP Pledges Investigation Of DoJ With November Win After FBI Raids Trump's Mar-A-Lago

Update from Fox about 15 minutes ago with additional details, but the actual text of the warrant is still evidently pending to be made public.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/federa ... mar-a-lago
by Rafe
Fri Aug 12, 2022 2:05 pm
Forum: Off-Topic
Topic: House GOP Pledges Investigation Of DoJ With November Win After FBI Raids Trump's Mar-A-Lago
Replies: 51
Views: 10487

Re: House GOP Pledges Investigation Of DoJ With November Win After FBI Raids Trump's Mar-A-Lago

Google-Fu as yet hasn't turned up the actual text of the warrant. However, from what I gather, the warrant really won't answer the important questions...that would be the affidavit used to obtain the warrant. So we'll get the parameters of the search, but not the core "why" and "what" that the affidavit had to show in order to get the judge to sign the warrant.
by Rafe
Wed Aug 10, 2022 11:10 am
Forum: Off-Topic
Topic: House GOP Pledges Investigation Of DoJ With November Win After FBI Raids Trump's Mar-A-Lago
Replies: 51
Views: 10487

Re: House GOP Pledges Investigation Of DoJ With November Win After FBI Raids Trump's Mar-A-Lago

powerboatr wrote: Wed Aug 10, 2022 9:11 am and we watched the video evidence at the ga senate that clearly showed a closed counting office, opened back up and they took out suitcases from under a table and began processing "votes" while no auditors present

they are knee deep in voter fraud for nov. pelosi is banging here drum about mail in votes and no need for proof of person.
i cant believe the house is still allowing phone in votes or proxy votes claiming covid fears .....meuhhhh
Well, ya know, we opened the border and let in at least 2.5 million illegal immigrants just since Biden took office. About 200,000 coming in every single month. We gotta find a way to let them vote in 2022 and 2024, right? :mad5
by Rafe
Tue Aug 09, 2022 1:58 pm
Forum: Off-Topic
Topic: House GOP Pledges Investigation Of DoJ With November Win After FBI Raids Trump's Mar-A-Lago
Replies: 51
Views: 10487

Re: House GOP Pledges Investigation Of DoJ With November Win After FBI Raids Trump's Mar-A-Lago

powerboatr wrote: Tue Aug 09, 2022 9:27 am its very disconcerting that the DOJ goes after trump for some documents, but left hillary swinging free for same thing and hidden servers to skirt mandates
its beyond one sided in the DOJ, and they wonder why Americans do not trust DOJ,
Especially interesting is that the President of the United States has the ability to declassify any document. Whatever was or was not taken, when Trump packed up his White House residency he was still the President; Biden hadn't been sworn in.

The president's capabilities were clarified by SCOTUS in 1988 in Department of Navy vs. Egan. The majority opinion wrote, in part: "The President, after all, is the 'Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States" according to Article II of the Constitution. "His authority to classify and control access to information bearing on national security...flows primarily from this constitutional investment of power in the President, and exists quite apart from any explicit congressional grant."

So if it's true that Biden's corrupt DOJ went after documents on the basis of their being classified, is there any legal leg to stand on? Hillary certainly had no such executive authority to protect her actions.

If the Mar-a-Lago raid (something never before in this country's history performed against a former President of the United States, BTW) supposedly dealt with different charges or issues that no doubt were involved somehow with the glorious waste of taxpayer money that is are the "January 6th Hearings," then what/where are the charges...or at least allegations? I haven't seen anything at all come from those hearings that could be actionable against Trump. But then maybe it's because those umpteen hours of sham television lost my interest very quickly...

Return to “House GOP Pledges Investigation Of DoJ With November Win After FBI Raids Trump's Mar-A-Lago”