I don't think I'd be comfortable sleeping ina building that doesn't let me protect myself... I'll have to keep this in mind when traveling. lots of good info.rotor wrote:I would assume so.Grundy1133 wrote: so if a hotel DOES have 30.06/30.07 signs, that includes your personal hotel room right?
Search found 6 matches
- Mon Mar 12, 2018 11:47 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Valid 30.06 sign?
- Replies: 18
- Views: 4831
Re: Valid 30.06 sign?
- Mon Mar 12, 2018 8:49 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Valid 30.06 sign?
- Replies: 18
- Views: 4831
Re: Valid 30.06 sign?
so if a hotel DOES have 30.06/30.07 signs, that includes your personal hotel room right?rotor wrote:If I had to bet, no hotel has ever been fined for not having this on their website.Russell wrote:Texas Occupations Code 2155.103 adds this requirement for hotels, but I am seeing nothing that says it nullifies a valid 30.06/30.07 posting if they don't do it.cprems wrote:You've also overlooked that the hotel MUST post it on their website if they're to be in compliance with the law. I believe that both must be done and not either/or. Hopefully someone will correct any omissions or incorrect data.
Sec. 2155.103. NOTICE REGARDING FIREARMS POLICY. (a) A hotel shall include on the hotel's Internet reservation website the hotel's policy regarding the possession, storage, and transportation of firearms.
(b) If a hotel provides a written confirmation or a written statement of terms and conditions to a consumer after accepting the consumer's hotel reservation by telephone, the hotel shall include information specifying how the consumer may review applicable guest policies. The guest policies must indicate the hotel's policy regarding the possession, storage, and transportation of firearms by guests.
(c) A hotel owner or keeper commits an offense if the person does not comply with this section. An offense under this subsection is a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of not more than $100.
Added by Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 237 (H.B. 333), Sec. 1, eff. September 1, 2013.
- Sun Mar 11, 2018 2:52 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Valid 30.06 sign?
- Replies: 18
- Views: 4831
Re: Valid 30.06 sign?
JustSomeOldGuy wrote:According to my understanding, if the font is less than 1", and it's mounted as a sign; not valid, even if they cover the walls with it like wallpaper. If an employee hands the card to you; valid, you've been notified.
- Sun Mar 11, 2018 1:52 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Valid 30.06 sign?
- Replies: 18
- Views: 4831
Re: Valid 30.06 sign?
thats my thinking.... for it to be that size and fit everything on there that needs to be on there, the font has to be at least under 1/4" lol even 1/8"rotor wrote:From the size that you describe it can not be a valid sign.tobymeg1 wrote:Walked into a Super Eight hotel today in Texas and saw a little sign, about notecard size, that had 30.06 printed on it on the teller window, Inside doors, etc etc. Is this a valid posting? Meaning If I walk into that hotel with my concealed can there be recourse for it if someone sees? See below for the picture of the notecard size sign. Now 30.07 isn’t posted so I could just open carry into there no problem but still. Curious about this one.
- Sun Mar 11, 2018 10:56 am
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Valid 30.06 sign?
- Replies: 18
- Views: 4831
Re: Valid 30.06 sign?
agreed, but thats not always the case. i know a place here locally that has a 30.06 but not a 30.07 and people open carry inside... if you come across a 30.06 and no 30.07 and you can see people inside OCing, or you know for a fact you're allowed to carry, and you're carrying IWB just flip your shirt behind your gun and bam its no longer concealed.TexasJohnBoy wrote:If you see a 30.06 and no 30.07, and you openly carry, its a near certainty that you'll be asked to leave, IMHO.
- Sun Mar 11, 2018 10:40 am
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Valid 30.06 sign?
- Replies: 18
- Views: 4831
Re: Valid 30.06 sign?
if its the size of a note card i doubt its within compliance... But cant say for sure cause there's no picture with your post.