I've already accepted that the trial, and the anti-2nd Amendment fallout, are going to be a dumpster fire.
My hope is that it doesn't get the national coverage that media likes to throw at these things... But if the media needs a patsy to remind everyone of the 'need' for gun control, expect this court trial to reach the MSM and stay there as long as needed.
Search found 3 matches
Return to “Shooting In Abilene”
- Thu Oct 04, 2018 3:36 pm
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: Shooting In Abilene
- Replies: 53
- Views: 15398
- Mon Sep 24, 2018 4:57 pm
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: Shooting In Abilene
- Replies: 53
- Views: 15398
Re: Shooting In Abilene
I agree. This sort of thing (especially with video) does significant damage to the optics of the 2nd amendment, despite the legal end-result. The sad thing is that a man (likely a loving husband and father), however justified it may be, is dead over an argument about garbage. Both sides had the opportunity to walk away before things turned deadly, it is a shame that they didn't.Charles L. Cotton wrote: ↑Mon Sep 24, 2018 4:52 pm No one should interpret this post to be supporting the actions by the defendants. Their problem is one they likely could have avoided, at least for the moment.
Chas.
- Mon Sep 24, 2018 10:22 am
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: Shooting In Abilene
- Replies: 53
- Views: 15398
Re: Shooting In Abilene
Go to 2:05 and hit the gear wheel. Adjust speed to .25
It looks like the bat was thrown at the dad and the son fired the shotgun.
I don't see how they aren't found guilty since there seem to be several factors where they lose protections (IE public space?, engaging in the confrontation, threatening language, etc...) IANAL though, and the law can be odd.
It looks like the bat was thrown at the dad and the son fired the shotgun.
I don't see how they aren't found guilty since there seem to be several factors where they lose protections (IE public space?, engaging in the confrontation, threatening language, etc...) IANAL though, and the law can be odd.