DEB wrote:<SNIP> Everytime I get into a conversation about firearms and religion with others, I can pretty much quickly figure out if they are from Texas or not. Even though they identify with conservatism, they always have some sort of nanny state requirement. Some examples being, "Have you seen how some of these soldiers act and you want to allow them full access to guns?" (we did in Iraq/Afghanistan), "Everyone who owns and especially carries a gun should have mandated special training first" (They never can tell me what that training should be, especially as soldiers apparently don't reach that invisible mark). <SNIP>
Consider the number on this very board who think CHL training should be more not less, that unlicensed personnel should not be allowed to carry and a litany of other "requirements" that go far beyond any intent of the Constitution.