57Coastie wrote:Assuming for the moment that your opinion is correct, but not necessarily agreeing with you, so what?Target1911 wrote:It has happened to me several time dealing with Arl pd but never on a traffic stop. I think its wrong and their reason is invalid.
To rephrase what I intend as a serious question, and not a wisecrack, would you have responded differently to the LEO when he told you his intentions? If you mean to imply that the OP should have refused to permit the LEO to carry out his intentions, I would suggest that you might cause someone else to regret having fallen into a trap you, a senior member, set for him.
Jim
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7824f/7824f0ea3df4a97d9b04cc91a6c32f49be551c28" alt="I Agree :iagree:"
1) Still have every encounter reviewed at the end of shift (probation).
2) Not had sufficient encounters yet with CHL holders to have reached a comfort level. God only knows what terrible scenarios he was taught that only experience will mitigate his apprehension.
Interestingly, I have had really snarky LEO encounters before but they didn't disarm me. Had he been the least bit condescending, discourteous or unprofessional there would have been a complaint filed but he was none of those.