Thank you. That answered my question completely. Actually makes sense. Not the first time a company has taken a huge hit based on the attitude of one rep. M&M-Mars comes to mind when they said no to Steven Spielberg when he asked to show M&M's in a little movie we like to call ET. That guy was summarily fired as Reese's Pieces enjoyed a huge leap in sales.CHL/LEO wrote:Long story short - we tested Berettas, Sigs and Glocks when we transitioned from revolvers to SA. Beretta didn't fair well ...Just curious, is there a rationale behind Sigs only? I mean, I like Sigs and all, but there is something to be said for the simplicity, reliability and ruggedness of the venerable Glock.
Search found 2 matches
- Tue Oct 21, 2008 12:53 am
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: LEO & CHL
- Replies: 24
- Views: 4970
Re: LEO & CHL
- Thu Oct 16, 2008 7:16 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: LEO & CHL
- Replies: 24
- Views: 4970
Re: LEO & CHL
Just curious, is there a rationale behind Sigs only? I mean, I like Sigs and all, but there is something to be said for the simplicity, reliability and ruggedness of the venerable Glock.CHL/LEO wrote: It's a crazy rule but one we have to live by. It doesn't make any sense that I must carry a Sig on my duty belt while at the same time carrying a Glock in another holster as a backup weapon - only in Dallas. The department realized how stupid it was but instead of fixing it they banned officers hired after a certain date from being able to carry anything but Sigs.