TexasCHLforum.com

Armybrat wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2020 1:32 pm Yes, the Ruger SP101 is a fine little magnum in both .357 and .327.

8F758BE7-5504-4307-91B0-EEAF640A1E63.jpeg

Glad that came up! The .327 Mag is a very interesting cartridge and it increases the capacity of the SP101. There are more similarities with the .357 Mag than some may be aware of. The sectional density of the .357" 125 gr. XTP is .140 while the sectional density of the .312" 100 gr. XTP is .147 and slightly higher. And sectional density plays a very large roll in penetration.

Looking at handload data shows that the .327 Mag is no weakling. From a 5" barrel using a MAX Charge of AA No 9, the Western Handload manual shows velocity at 1574 FPS at 8000 PSI below the cartridges Max Average Pressure, or MAP of 45,000 PSI. And there's another bonus there. Older Magnums had their MAPs determined by the Copper Crusher method, or CUP. Rating this cartridge in the PSI system should help give a better understanding of the pressure levels.

Unfortunately, I've only had 1 chance to fire the Ruger LCR with factory loads at a slightly more sedate velocity. Still potent, and recoil seemed quite controllable. I have not run any loads through the QAS computer program as yet, but I know it will impress. If anyone wants to see those results from water testing, just shoot me a PM or post in the Reloading section. The test parameters are easy enough to collect while I still use the 1 - gallon water jugs, formerly milk jugs. Velocity upon impact, or chronographing at the same distance as the 1st jug is placed, recovered mass and average recovered dia. are all that's needed. As far as average dia., that's the 3 greatest dia. measurements on the expanded petals and the 3 inner dias., between the petals.

For anyone who's not quite comfortable with .357 Mag. recoil from small revolvers, and Ruger shows the weight of the LCR at 17 oz., the .327 Mag appears to be an excellent alternative. Handloading should make it a blast!

patterson wrote: ↑Tue Jan 21, 2020 7:10 pm The Ruger SP101 .357 with a 4.2 inch barrel is a good revolver Ive shot 38s and .357 rounds through it and is very accurate.

Haven't fired a 4.2" SP101 yet, but I've fired plenty of magnums from the 3" model. The SP101 is surprisingly robust. A good many of the rounds were .357 Mag Defense handloads with the REM 140 gr. SJHP made specifically for the 3" SP101 and a 3" M65 Lady Smith using powders that don't lose as much velocity from shorter barrels, and are low in muzzle flash.

L-Frame 586/686 and the GP100 are about the perfect size for .357 Mag carry/field revolver if you're going to be firing full power factory loads or handloads. Smith N-Frames have been mentioned, and while their frames are larger, it's the extra weight of the barrel lug on the L-Frames that makes them more comfortable to shoot for me, and tested with a 6" 586 and a 6" M28.

It kinda comes down to how much you shoot .357 Magnum. If you want to become proficient it will take practice. Especially in proficiency firing Double-Action with full power loads above 500 Ft/lbs of muzzle energy.

It's great that Colt is bringing back the Python. I heard a few weeks back that Tom Gresham and his son were among the gun media at the Colt gathering. Tom had a Python he inherited from Grits and passed to his son, and they took it with them to the media event. Tom stated that the DA of the new Python might be better than the original, and that the new Pythons are built stronger, mentioning some incidences where full-time use of full power loads proved problematic for the original. That's been so long ago that I had nearly forgotten about it.

It will likely take some time to get past the initial surge and lack of availability for new Python sales, and the first ones will likely come at scalper's prices. Not quite in the same market as the 586/686 and the GP100 due to MSRP that's closer to the CZ owned DW 715. The Colt that was intended to compete more closely to the 586/686 and the GP100 was the King Cobra from the Mark V series that preceded it. Good revolvers, but not quite the equal of the L-Frame Smith and GP100.

For handloading with Magnum Handgun propellants like those based on W296, I long believed that 5" of barrel length was a good choice in order to get all of the powder to burn completely. The good news there is that there is a 5" GP100 readily available, albeit listed as a "Distributor Exclusive." Finding a 5" Magnum Smith won't be so easy, and prepare to pay a premium with most of them belonging to collectors.

Recently, I've been pleased with what I've seen from my full-power handloads charged with AA 11FS that is essentially a flash-suppressed version of W296. Flash is actually lower than other powders I use for .357 Mag defense type loads with True Blue for barrels shorter than 4". AA No 7 and No 9 being good choices for a broad range of loads and barrel lengths. But from the 4.2" GP100 I fire the most, 11 FS shows promise.

For those who plan to shoot at least 50% of the time with full-power loads, or plan to handload their own, the revolver needs to be up to the task. Smith L-Frames and the GP100, in particular, are very good choices.

If you have an internal debate of single-action vs double-action revolvers, consider yourself lucky. Getting close to 63 now, I feel rather blessed in finding that because my eyes are not as good as they once were, nor my hands as steady; I can shoot my GP100 as well at 7 yards in Double-Action as I can my poly-frame, striker-fired favorite.

I started handgunning over 40 years ago with both: A Ruger Blackhawk in .357 Magnum, 6 1/2" barrel and a vintage 4" S&W M57 that belonged to friends who were brothers. The M57 made an impression I can not wash away, while the ammo we fired was likely handloaded. I didn't know a thing about how either caliber was loaded in terms of ballistics and recoil. I know that I found out right away that I did not like the Peacemaker sized revolver grip for shooting magnum ammo. Long since I've found double-actions to be more comfortable to shoot, within reason. I have no need for any handgun round more powerful than the .44 Magnum. If you like bigger and badder? Good on you.

I've done little modification to the revolver I shoot most often. I installed a lighter trigger return spring from Wolff that's just lighter than the factory spring. The hammer spring is also Wolff, but at the factory weight rating. I won't say that this is what works best for all revolvers, it's what's worked best for my Ruger DA revolvers for many years. And to the point that I find a DA trigger to be typically better than a SA trigger with new revolvers.

I couldn't care a whit about being a traditionalist. Track the history of the first revolver DA Revolver trigger mechanisms and you might find that getting them right did not come without great effort. Hollywood or not, and I mean after following the Colt Peacemaker/Single Action Army.

You're in luck: You can get a Ruger GP100 with a 5" barrel. We just started shooting my shooting partners S&W 686+ 4" 7 - shooter. Never thought I'd be interested in a 7 shot .357 Magnum, but all signs are good at this point. I have a 4" blue GP100 made in 2013 and it's a gem. Really good DA trigger. There is no concern about shooting the warmest magnum loads from a GP100. You can maximize the potential of your rifle loads and never have to worry about your revolver being able to handle those loads with gusto.