TexasCHLforum.com

srothstein wrote: ↑Fri Aug 13, 2021 7:12 am I had to look up the trigger to see what the fuss was about. It is definitely on the edge of the law and I can see a court going either way on it. I think a court would rule it legal if the right case was brought and rule it a machine gun in the wrong case (used in a crime for example). The way it works is pushing the limit of anyone's definition of a single squeeze of the trigger. It is basically a bump stock condensed down into just the trigger. There is a little bar that forces the trigger forward after each shot while you are squeezing it back anyway.

I personally would not want one of these because it makes it almost impossible to fire a single shot but I think the NFA is unconstitutional anyway. And, I think technology has caught up and passed the law on what a single trigger action is. If the government sees this as the biggest problem it has to spend resources on, we really need to refocus our government.