TexasCHLforum.com

twomillenium wrote:

CZp10 wrote:

twomillenium wrote: Just out of curiosity, would you support the Government telling a citizen where they must bank, eat or shop and spend their hard earned money?

Are you going to make some sort of intelligent point or not? Your question is clearly leading and meant to say something, but you apparently didn’t think it through. The government already does all those things, and has for a very long time. Banks are very highly regulated, only certain people under certain conditions can open a bank. Food establishments have to go through multiple layers of government to get a license to do business. The government is already telling people where they can eat and bank, they already tell you where you can live via zoning laws, etc., etc. So it would be nice if you could just come out and say what your point is, because I really don’t understand what you are trying to say.

I have been very clear on my issue, which millions of Americans agree with, by the way. I think a business can refuse to serve me if they wish, they can ask me to leave and I have to leave, I have no problem with that. They can even put up whatever signs they want, but a business open to the public should not be seemingly granted the sacred power of judge and jury by making the simple fact of walking past a sign an automatic criminal violation by a law abiding LTC holder. I started a whole thread on this previously, the only thing I have asked for is rescinding the criminal violation part of 30.06.

I was just checking on how far you want the Government to make someone else do what you think they should. However, the Government does not tell you where to eat, bank or shop. They do tell you how to spend quite abit of you hard earned money though. Don't forget to check under your bed tonight. BTW you made my point. Thanks and have nice evening.