Do you happen to know how many of the 112K denials in 2018 pertain to questions on the 4473?jb2012 wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2020 5:18 pm In 2018 there were 112,000 NICS Denials, and 12 were prosecuted. Instead of changing the verbiage on a 4473, how about prosecutors start doing their job. On top of that Changing the wording on the 4473 still does absolutely nothing towards prosecuting folks that lie on their 4473.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “ATF proposed changes to 4473”
- Thu Feb 06, 2020 8:02 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: ATF proposed changes to 4473
- Replies: 14
- Views: 6314
Re: ATF proposed changes to 4473
- Thu Feb 06, 2020 3:00 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: ATF proposed changes to 4473
- Replies: 14
- Views: 6314
Re: ATF proposed changes to 4473
I see the rationale behind 2 and 3. 2 makes perfect sense from a state ID standpoint. 3 is an unnecessary knee-jerk reaction, but I get it as a point of clarification in the event that the ATF needs to charge someone for lying on a 4473. Now item number 1 needs to be updated by added a second page full of lines for those times I need to buy 30+ in a single transaction. You never know, right?