TexasCHLforum.com

I interpreted the DPS instructors statement as saying that a business posting a 30.06 sign, even if non-compliant with the law, shows the 'intent' of the business to prohibit CHL's from carrying there, but they in no way were they saying it was legally binding and you would be prosecuted. However, as Charles stated, if you want to be a test case on those that are not close, we will all the moral support we can muster in your legal battle.

jimlongley wrote: I have yet to see a business that was not required by TABC to post the "unlicensed possession" sign do so. The sign means that alcohol is being sold, not for consumption on premises, by that business, and that it is legal for a CHL holder to carry there under the authority of their CHL, but it is a felony for anyone else to carry there. You won't see that sign on a business that sells for consumption on premises, nor will you see that sign on a business that does not sell alcohol, it is a TABC sign, not a CHL sign.

Just a correction, these are also required to be posted at businesses that make less than 51% of their revenue from on-premise consumption sales. Any restaurant that serves alcohol is required to post them. If they sell alcohol at all, then they must post either the blue 'Unlicensed possession sign OR the 51% red sign, as determined by their license.

This was a Mom's Demand Action hit, no mention of OCT in the video link posted by Crossfire.

The one they says is missing the Spanish is the Blue 'Unlicensed Possession' sign from TABC. It's not even a 30.06 and the TABC sign doesn't require the second language unless directed by the TABC. The Chucky Cheese sign is a generic sign and tried to mention the 'Unlicensed Possession' language.

Bottom line, this is kinda old news as MDA has been at this for awhile now. However, you can bet they are contacting legislators to try and get someone to make modifications to the current 30.06 language and/or sign requirements.