Search found 2 matches
Return to “Indiana Supreme Court - 'Officer Testimony' > Video Evidence”
- Thu Sep 04, 2014 12:37 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Indiana Supreme Court - 'Officer Testimony' > Video Evidence
- Replies: 21
- Views: 1877
Re: Indiana Supreme Court - 'Officer Testimony' > Video Evid
It will usually boil down to a combination of both the dashcam video and the officer's testimony against the defendant. Dashcams can help or hurt a case for both parties. I personally am all in favor of as many cameras and audio recrodings as can be obtained. It jsut goes to show solidly who was right and who was wrong.
- Tue Sep 02, 2014 2:31 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Indiana Supreme Court - 'Officer Testimony' > Video Evidence
- Replies: 21
- Views: 1877
Re: Indiana Supreme Court - 'Officer Testimony' > Video Evid
The 'fog' line is the bright white painted line on the right side of the highway at the edge of the pavement. It is the line that is more visble to the driver when in heavy fog and using fog lights to show where the edge of the road is.VMI77 wrote:Excuse my ignorance, but what and where located is a "fog line?"bigity wrote:Not running around saying the sky is falling here, just an interesting (and potentially scary) precedent.
"Deputy Claeys testified “both passenger side tires were over the fog line” and “completely off the roadway” “twice.”" - Apparently the video in question does not show this happening.
EDIT TO ADD: Here is an article on the 'reasonable suspicion' validity in Missouri on crossing the fog line http://law.missouri.edu/lawreview/files ... hitney.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;