Search found 5 matches

by Keith B
Sun Jan 29, 2012 8:14 am
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: Man accused of inproperly passing Concealed Weapons students
Replies: 43
Views: 5892

Re: Man accused of inproperly passing Concealed Weapons stud

RPB wrote:
Keith B wrote: Sure, I would help anyone who needed their magazines loaded because of a disability. But there are limits on what you can help with.
Awwwwe if I had reallllyyyyy bad arthritis I couldn't get you to pull the trigger for me? :mrgreen: <kidding>
RPB, I might pull your trigger for you, just don't ask me to pull your finger. :shock: :lol:
by Keith B
Sat Jan 28, 2012 7:05 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: Man accused of inproperly passing Concealed Weapons students
Replies: 43
Views: 5892

Re: Man accused of inproperly passing Concealed Weapons stud

Hoosier Daddy wrote:
Keith B wrote:
wgoforth wrote: The Sarge did tell us that if there was someone who had say arthritis, if they could demonstrate they could load and rack once, we could do it the other times for them if needed.
Yep, you can assist. The way I think everyone sees it is you will have plenty of time to load BEFORE something happens. You should not be needing to load magazines when you are in a defensive situation. Show you know how, then if you have a physical issue where you are really slow or just can't, then the RSO can help load them.
The same rules about helping during the test should apply to all disabilities.
Sure, I would help anyone who needed their magazines loaded because of a disability. But there are limits on what you can help with.
by Keith B
Sat Jan 28, 2012 11:39 am
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: Man accused of inproperly passing Concealed Weapons students
Replies: 43
Views: 5892

Re: Man accused of inproperly passing Concealed Weapons stud

JustMe wrote:
alvins wrote:my instructor was terrible for our chl class. we hardly went over any laws and such.we spent more time going over the answers to the test then anything else.
That is kinda the situation I was in--I personally did not feel that the class I took was beneficial. More of a "if you can endure-you get the magic ticket"

I feel ok personally, because I have done the research, and studied and KNOW what I need to KNOW. But on the other hand, there were some people in the class that I feel won't have done the same things I did--and if they go strictly by what they learned in the class-they will have problems!

But, I will also admit that I have no understanding of the people who were there to renew who said that they hadn't even touched their gun "since the last renewal class" (and their shooting showed it!) Maybe it is just me--but if I am going to have it, I am going to know everything I can--and practice!
Instructors like you guys had, while maybe meeting the requirements are unfortunately part of instruction. I have over 3,500 hours of training in my company, besides college and other schools. And in all cases there are good instructors and poor. I really feel some of these instructors are part of the issue that the DPS is trying to address by laying out the course requirements more thoroughly. This attempts to force the instructors that are not adequately covering laws, safety, etc into a required amount of time for each. On the flip side, it also forces those instructors that were doing a great job of covering things to restructure their courses to meet the requirements exactly. I guess if it helps push some of the mediocre instructors into better teaching, or some of the poor instructors out, then it will be a benefit. However, there will always be those instructors that are just not good at teaching. They are monotone, boring and don't make a class fun as well as educational.

JustMe, the fact that you are here on the forum and active is an indication you take your CHL seriously and want to understand it. But, you are unfortunately some of the small minority of CHL holders who do follow through. I know many who have their license but never carry, and even those that carry but never fire their guns between renewals. Not uncommon. If it weren't for department requirements on re-qualification every 6 months or a year, then there would be many LEO's that would be the same. I know quite a few of them that have not had their duty weapon (or any gun) out since last qualification.

Bottom line, carrying a firearm is a huge responsibility, 2A rights aside, and anyone who does needs to understand the ramifications of carrying that weapon and the importance of following safety and legal rules. Anyone who takes the responsibility lightly needs to rethink their reasons for carrying.
by Keith B
Fri Jan 27, 2012 5:32 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: Man accused of inproperly passing Concealed Weapons students
Replies: 43
Views: 5892

Re: Man accused of inproperly passing Concealed Weapons stud

wgoforth wrote: The Sarge did tell us that if there was someone who had say arthritis, if they could demonstrate they could load and rack once, we could do it the other times for them if needed.
Yep, you can assist. The way I think everyone sees it is you will have plenty of time to load BEFORE something happens. You should not be needing to load magazines when you are in a defensive situation. Show you know how, then if you have a physical issue where you are really slow or just can't, then the RSO can help load them.
by Keith B
Fri Jan 27, 2012 3:42 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: Man accused of inproperly passing Concealed Weapons students
Replies: 43
Views: 5892

Re: Man accused of inproperly passing Concealed Weapons stud

WSimons wrote:That's the funny part; there was no retry... everyone passed on the first go, even those who'd never shot a gun before and came trying to qualify with an old .25 (no joke)
Hope your instructor didn't allow them to qualify with that. Has to be a .32 cal minimum.

Return to “Man accused of inproperly passing Concealed Weapons students”