Well, we now see what your agenda was; and that is to see your friend get a lighter sentence. Hopefully, if there are truly mitigating circumstances, then he will get a lighter sentence. However, he should have thought about that before he broke in. And, if the homeowner is truly not doing what they should, they will eventually get theirs, especially if they are running their mouth. However, as I already stated, the police apparently found no evidence of wrong doing on their part as they were not charged.
Bottom line, he did wrong, and he will pay for it. If you dance, you must pay the piper. He is lucky he didn't lose his life in the shooting.
Also, I see you made one more post after your 'last post'.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “WATAUGA, Texas - Home Invasion Suspect Shot”
- Mon Mar 19, 2012 1:41 pm
- Forum: The Crime Blotter
- Topic: WATAUGA, Texas - Home Invasion Suspect Shot
- Replies: 29
- Views: 3325
- Mon Mar 12, 2012 12:52 pm
- Forum: The Crime Blotter
- Topic: WATAUGA, Texas - Home Invasion Suspect Shot
- Replies: 29
- Views: 3325
Re: WATAUGA, Texas - Home Invasion Suspect Shot
So, which of your friends or relatives was this that got shot? You seem to have an awfully lot of information on this event. The homeowner was never charged with anything, so apprently they legally possesed the rifle.Anonymous123 wrote:On the topic of the stance, The news report says that, the suspect TURNED facing, and ill say it again, facing the homeowner, and by then he had chosen to shoot,.
Why I had brought this up is because, why does the owner feel the need to falsify this claim, trying to justify his right for self-defense, when he has it regardless according to castle doctrine.
Meaning the homeowner more than likely did not shout a warning, prior to releasing the first shot.
Being said, makes the situation more suspicious as to what information or details the homeowner is guarding
Felony/Drug Charges = No gun in Texas. He should not even possess a firearm,. Neither condone the selling of drugs out of his residence, HE IS AWARE, of what his son is doing.
The point of all this is, There is no SET bad guy, both partys are in the wrong, 16 year old with a handgun is someones home is wrong regardless, but why let the drug dealer duo son and father get the justice and glorification of self-defense in this story. I strongly believe that this was a drug deal gone wrong, I have clarified the information from a LEO that there was no sign of forced entry to the home. So the Castle Doctrine can justify the shooting/killing of anybody just if they're on your property? Especially if you're a drug dealer? That is a very illegitimate claim and the law should be discluded if you're conducting illegal activities KNOWING that what you're doing and you are AWARE that you're family is in danger at all times due to criminal conduct. So now due to The State of Texas, the 16 year old is going to face 2-99 prison time, for more than likely a mutual agreement gone sour, while the drug dealer and home owner will continue to orchestrate such events. Justice 0, Morality 0, Criminals 1. I'm 17 years old by the way
Bottom line, if you break into someone's home to commit a crime, then they have the right to defend themselves. Period. No matter what their past history.