They should have fought this one. She was totally wrong in fighting the officer. Like it or not, you get pulled over, you sign the ticket and fight it in court like you are supposed to. You don't pull the kind of stuff she did and then claim your civil rights were violated, then get handed $40K to shut up.surprise_i'm_armed wrote:http://www.statesman.com/news/content/n ... XU%60UZTYU]UWUcUWUZUaUaUcTYWYWZV&urcm=y
For her questionable behavior, granny has received a $40,000 settlement from Travis County.
SIA
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Taser used on 72 yr. old Granny...”
- Wed Oct 07, 2009 2:16 pm
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: Taser used on 72 yr. old Granny...
- Replies: 47
- Views: 8486
Re: Taser used on 72 yr. old Granny...
- Fri Jun 12, 2009 9:45 am
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: Taser used on 72 yr. old Granny...
- Replies: 47
- Views: 8486
Re: Taser used on 72 yr. old Granny...
I disagree. Officers can, and do, touch females if needed. Just because the arrestee is female doesn't mean they can't be subdued if the person or officers safety comes into play. Pushing a person or wrestling them to the ground is required sometimes, male or female. In this case, the dash cam shows the officer played it by the book and there was no inappropriate physical contact.Cajundude wrote:Not really, only 38. However, the officer would be in trouble for touching the female, or letting her run into traffic so he is in a Catch 22.Oldgringo wrote:I take it that you've never been old...yet?Cajundude wrote:
Just because you are old should not excuse you from being an, well, pain.
When I was a LEO we had a couple of females (and they were NOT ladies) in the area that could probably have taken me in a fair fight. The 'Mag-Light massage' worked on one of them one night, but it was administered by a lady officer. However, I wouldn't have hesitated to shampoo her myself if there was a need to do so.