TexasCHLforum.com

Here is a post from the The High Road http://www.thehighroad.org/showpost.php ... stcount=17" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; stating it was .92" wide.

Not sure it is accurate, but here is what they had compared to the PF9:

(text of the post)
----------PF9---------------709 slim
capacity--7+1---------------7+1
barrel-----3.1"---------------3.2"
OAL-------5.85"-------------6.2"
width-----.88" (grip/slide?)---.92" grips **
-----------------------------.97" slide
weight----14.7 oz empty-----19 oz (site doesn't state, assuming empty)

Looks to be fairly comparable to the pf9, I think it would fit nicely in the front pocket of my cargo shorts but not in my jeans. I want to get my hands on one, it sounds just about right for me

**(709 width measurements taken from colt1903's link, see post #10)
other measurements:
http://www.taurususa.com/2009catalog/?catalog_page=48" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.mouseguns.com/PocketAutoComparison.jpg" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;