Search found 3 matches

by Keith B
Mon Apr 06, 2009 8:16 am
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: misdemeanor question
Replies: 7
Views: 1257

Re: misdemeanor question

seamusTX wrote:If you weren't fingerprinted, you're good to go. The requirement to report arrests for which you were fingerprinted is not in state law. It's a DPS regulation. You can find it in the instructions for filling out the CHL application.

Also, if you were a minor (under 18 years of age) these offenses might be sealed and practically nonexistent.

The key is to find what you were actually convicted of, if anything. Paying a fine does not result in a guilty verdict in many cases.

- Jim
:iagree:

And also, welcome to the forum!! :tiphat:
by Keith B
Sun Apr 05, 2009 9:17 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: misdemeanor question
Replies: 7
Views: 1257

Re: misdemeanor question

seamusTX wrote:P.S.: I did not research Arizona law.

You need to find out what you were actually convicted of.

- Jim
Good point Jim. It will depend on how the alcohol was obtained. If they are Class 3 violations, then they should be equivalent to Class C here, and you may be OK.
by Keith B
Sun Apr 05, 2009 8:50 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: misdemeanor question
Replies: 7
Views: 1257

Re: misdemeanor question

IANAL, but these are two Arizona Class 1 misdemeanors (same as Texas Class A misdemeanor) alcohol offenses within 10 years. So if I am not mistaken, it would be considered under GC 11.172 (15) (c) as being chemically depended and you would not be eligible.See http://www.txdps.state.tx.us/ftp/forms/ls-16.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;.

Return to “misdemeanor question”