Maybe the good guys should start rioting so antifa can be charged with disorderly conduct.C-dub wrote:I suppose it would be, but there's always that little caveat that if it's incites a riot or violence then all bets are off. And it seems like some folks are so easily incited these days that just saying "Thank you M'am" can get you in trouble.
Search found 3 matches
Return to “SCOTUS rules "hate speech" constitutionally protected.”
- Tue Aug 22, 2017 6:19 pm
- Forum: Federal
- Topic: SCOTUS rules "hate speech" constitutionally protected.
- Replies: 23
- Views: 10444
Re: SCOTUS rules "hate speech" constitutionally protected.
- Thu Aug 17, 2017 6:25 pm
- Forum: Federal
- Topic: SCOTUS rules "hate speech" constitutionally protected.
- Replies: 23
- Views: 10444
Re: SCOTUS rules "hate speech" constitutionally protected.
That would fit with the Left's ideology. It would be wrong, in their eyes, to prosecute BLM for inciting violence against police. However, it's right up their alley to infringe the RKBA by making some good ol' boy ineligible for an LTC because he used a four letter word for feces.The Annoyed Man wrote:I don't know. The issue is "hate speech", not profanity. It may be that profanity isn't protected speech.ninjabread wrote:Does this mean Texans are no longer at risk of losing their LTC for using salty language in Walmart?
- Thu Aug 17, 2017 6:01 pm
- Forum: Federal
- Topic: SCOTUS rules "hate speech" constitutionally protected.
- Replies: 23
- Views: 10444
Re: SCOTUS rules "hate speech" constitutionally protected.
Does this mean Texans are no longer at risk of losing their LTC for using salty language in Walmart?