pdubyoo,
Conspicuous racism is de rigueur with many minorities and never a counterbalancing peep will be uttered by any leftist. Female chauvinism can be added to this mix, but hey, we're male, so we're not supposed to mention this bit of sexism...
Consider similar wording - Boldly asserting the richness of male Caucasian life experiences as a basis for judicial decision and the immediate, bombastic response. The left would go bonkers.
Hypocrisy be thy name.
The Constitution - what's that?
Knowledge of the 2a - say what?
So now we have a female Archie Bunker lurching her way to the Supreme Court.
Theatre of the absurd at it's finest...
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Sotomayor and 2A Rights”
- Wed Jun 03, 2009 2:25 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Sotomayor and 2A Rights
- Replies: 53
- Views: 6470
- Sat May 30, 2009 6:10 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Sotomayor and 2A Rights
- Replies: 53
- Views: 6470
Re: Sotomayor and 2A Rights
Her immoderate declarations are farcical. A heavy weight intellectual she is not. Her drollery will be at least entertaining.
If she gets the nod, her ego will fill and sail and we'll be off to gaffe land.
It'll be great fun listening to her discredit herself.
If she gets the nod, her ego will fill and sail and we'll be off to gaffe land.
It'll be great fun listening to her discredit herself.