I think my first question to my client would be if they really want to spend thousands fighting a $200 fine?Soccerdad1995 wrote:If I was a defense lawyer and my client had been charged with violating a 30.06 sign (where no 30.07 sign was present), then I think my first question of the prosecution's star witness would be "did you see my client's gun?" If yes, then it sounds like it wasn't really concealed in the first place.
Search found 1 match
Return to “30.06 sign but no 30.07”
- Sat Oct 08, 2016 10:51 am
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: 30.06 sign but no 30.07
- Replies: 45
- Views: 9106