Interesting point. Though defending you, and winning that defense, are two separate things. Isn't it your attorney's job to vigorously defend you? Not to pre-judge you? It feels to me like they are looking for reasons to not spend money on defending you, like any good insurance company. They are not in the business of actually helping people, they are in the business of collecting premiums. Any plausible way out of paying, they jump at.Ruark wrote:ScottDLS wrote:Ruark wrote:
2. You're digging in the woodwork here. They will defend you only if you're carrying in a place where you can do so lawfully. They have no choice. If they would defend you if you carried past an 06 and shot somebody, people would just start ignoring 06's. This is based on a long discussion I had with the CEO of a major service.
It would only take one or two cases to get a precedent set, then it would either be OK to ignore signs, or not...