Boating accidents. The bottom of the lakes and rivers must be covered with firearms.Soccerdad1995 wrote:
A lot of these guns must be wearing out very quickly if gun ownership is truly decreasing.
![Jester :biggrinjester:](./images/smilies/biggrinjester.gif)
Return to “Open letter to progressive socialists and other leftists”
Boating accidents. The bottom of the lakes and rivers must be covered with firearms.Soccerdad1995 wrote:
A lot of these guns must be wearing out very quickly if gun ownership is truly decreasing.
Like the term "assault rifle" the left is using "gun culture" as a baseball bat to beat everyone within reach of their words. Their culture is so hopelessly corrupt and evil, all they can do is point out the perceived faults of everyone who disagrees with them in the least amount. Often they will demonize their own if one of them happens to point out hypocrisy in their position or actually embraces a fact or two.Scott Farkus wrote:There is a lot to say about that whole article, but I found this paragraph in particular to be troubling.
First of all, nobody is arguing that we have a right to keep firearms as part of a "culture". We're arguing that we have a right to keep firearms because the 2nd Amendment says we do. And if you want to scratch even deeper, the 2nd Amendment is there to codify/clarify a natural right that the founders considered self-evident. It has nothing to do with a "culture"; if anything, that's a card HIS side plays with regularity.And when you say something is part of your culture, you're placing it beyond reasoned judgment. Its status as a component of culture infuses it with value that can't be argued against. I don't tell you that your religious rituals are silly, because they have deep meaning for those within that culture. Your ethnic group's traditional music may not be pleasing to my ears, but I'm not going to argue that it sucks and you ought to start listening to real music, defined as whatever I happen to like. The food your parents taught you to make from the old country might not be to my taste, but I'll appreciate it (at least once or twice) as a window into another aspect of our rich human tapestry.
Second, people like this author most certainly do tell people that their religious rituals are silly. Not only that, they have increasingly pushed laws and social conventions that force religious people to choose between their beliefs and their ability to make a living or even participate in the public arena. He's just flat out lying when he claims otherwise.
I have utterly no clue what his point is about ethnic music or food from "the old country". Am I missing something?
I'd never heard of "The Week" or the author before today either. The article was linked at a blog I read. I don't go to leftist sites, but I do read stuff like this because it's good to keep up with the thoughts of the opposition.Abraham wrote:Never heard of Paul Waldman in "The Week" - Neither he or the magazine.
Probably because it's a leftist skewed rag I wouldn't read were it given to me.