So basically, a treaty that usurps the legal authority effecting the treaty is self defeating because it would be unconstitutional. Works for me.srothstein wrote:There is a major legal theory that will come up. Our Constitution is what makes treaties legal and gives them legal effect. But the Constitution also forbids certain laws. If a treaty violates the Constitution, can it ever have legal effect? My personal opinion is no, but given the wording of the treaty phrase in the Constitution, I know some people who believe it can.Locksmith wrote:Obama proposes signing this treaty :(
Search found 1 match
Return to “inter-American arms trafficking treaty”
- Sat Apr 25, 2009 9:46 pm
- Forum: Federal
- Topic: inter-American arms trafficking treaty
- Replies: 11
- Views: 5046