This^.....Could it pass, sure. Will the tax stamp go away? Not a chance in the world. They aren't about to give up that funding. Either way it has my support simply because I don't think it is fair to wait for NFA items and the hoops you have to jump through to get them. I'll pay the tax stamp but I want the background check to be the same as for a firearm. I think that is a fair compromise.Dad24GreatKids wrote:It's more likely to pass if they retain the $200 tax. I hope it passes as is, but politicians normally hate to give up a revenue stream. I'm just speculating, but I bet they would generate more revenue by passing this bill and reducing the tax to $100. They'd surely make up the difference just on added volume. What they give up is the tracking mechanism.
Search found 1 match
Return to “House introduces bill to deregulate suppressors”
- Wed Oct 05, 2016 8:07 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: House introduces bill to deregulate suppressors
- Replies: 45
- Views: 10575