Well hopefully motion to dismiss is granted within the next couple weeks. Frankly I wish it was mere minutes but courts.....JALLEN wrote:The arguments dealt only with the propriety of the requested unjunction.Glockster wrote:Charles L. Cotton wrote:A good judge will dismiss it and impose sanctions on the attorney and the clients.dlh wrote:Federal judges quickly toss frivolous cases these days. I expect that will happen in this case.
Chas.
Do you have any sense from this as to why there wasn't an outright dismissal? It seemed to me as a non-lawyer that the court found no merit in any of the arguments.
There is a motion to dismiss still pending.
There could be no outright dismissal today, as the issue before the court was whether to issue a preliminary injunction. No evidence has been received on the merits, beyond the motion on the injunction, so it would be improper and premature to dismiss on the merits now.
The pending motions to dismiss are not on the merits exactly, in the sense of a ruling after taking evidence.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Three professors sue UT to keep guns out of their classrooms”
- Tue Aug 23, 2016 4:01 am
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Three professors sue UT to keep guns out of their classrooms
- Replies: 288
- Views: 66839
Re: Three professors sue UT to keep guns out of their classrooms
- Mon Aug 22, 2016 4:58 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Three professors sue UT to keep guns out of their classrooms
- Replies: 288
- Views: 66839
Re: Three professors sue UT to keep guns out of their classrooms
The news won't cover this. They like the headlines only, they never do updates on previous stories.TreyHouston wrote:THANKS FOR THE UPDATE!!!! Of course I've seen nothing on the news !!!!v7a wrote:Preliminary Injunction has been DENIED.