My thoughts exactly!The Annoyed Man wrote:Will STILL cost a business owner thousands of dollars.......... to satisfy the 4% of the state's population that is licensed to carry a firearm.....of whom only a percentage actually carry their firearms?DDfst21 wrote:Just a few points to clarify:
1. Business Owners have the choice to remove the signs if they don't want the expense of providing locker.
2. Keyless user definable combination locks do not require a key.
3. Suggested wording as follows:
Business owners in Texas opting to post 30.06 / 30.07 notification signs shall be required to provide reasonable accommodation for patrons to secure weapons before entering the premises of the business. Reasonable accommodation is defined as a secure locker with individual felt lined and weather resistant compartments not less than 5 inches high by 10 inches wide by 5 inches deep accessed by a user definable combination lock. Locker shall be secured by concealed bolts to substantial building structure or other suitable structure and capable of meeting the equivalent of the forced entry provisions of GSA class 5W containers (Fed. Spec AA-F-358) for not less than 10 man minutes.
Number of individual compartments shall be based on the lesser number of 10 percent of the total occupant load as defined by the building code in force in the local jurisdiction or two (2) compartments for each 1,000 SF of gross floor area, but not less than two (2). Storage in such lockers outside of normal business hours is prohibited.
It's not going to happen. They are not required to provide you with a microphone and a stage to exercise your 1st Amendment right. And they have rights as property owners too.
Just don't spend your money there. Spend it somewhere that appreciates your rights. That's what most of us do. Furthermore, a 30.07 sign doesn't exclude you. Just cover the gun up and go on in. It's 30.06 signs that are the real problem. Even so, vote with your wallet.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Businesses Posting 30.06/07 Should Provide Safe Storage”
- Sun Mar 19, 2017 10:25 pm
- Forum: General Legislative Discussions
- Topic: Businesses Posting 30.06/07 Should Provide Safe Storage
- Replies: 24
- Views: 9178
Re: Businesses Posting 30.06/07 Should Provide Safe Storage
- Sun Mar 19, 2017 4:29 pm
- Forum: General Legislative Discussions
- Topic: Businesses Posting 30.06/07 Should Provide Safe Storage
- Replies: 24
- Views: 9178
Re: Businesses Posting 30.06/07 Should Provide Safe Storage
I may be off here, but I personally would not feel comfortable releasing control of my firearm to an individual or private business who would rather I be unarmed. I have no problem with 30.07 locations requesting that I cover up, however I have elected not to patronize restaurants, movie theaters, and other locations that would prohibit me from carrying completely. There are exceptions to places I will go, that are currently off limits.
I must disarm when I go vote
I must disarm when I go to customer sites for work (rare)
I must disarm if I report for jury summons
I must disarm if I have to enter a school to pick up children
I must disarm if I have to go to the post office (very rare)
These are places I have a duty to go, but it is prohibited to carry (for now). But for places where I have a choice? I elect to go elsewhere. This is just my opinion. Others are free to do as they please.
I must disarm when I go vote
I must disarm when I go to customer sites for work (rare)
I must disarm if I report for jury summons
I must disarm if I have to enter a school to pick up children
I must disarm if I have to go to the post office (very rare)
These are places I have a duty to go, but it is prohibited to carry (for now). But for places where I have a choice? I elect to go elsewhere. This is just my opinion. Others are free to do as they please.