TexasCHLforum.com

lfinsr wrote:

Bayoutalker wrote:

lfinsr wrote:The problem guys and gals is, this spreads like a cancer. The battle needs to begin here and now instead of allowing it to spread here. As mentioned earlier, the state is governed by the population centers. There are literally millions of citizens there affected by this who had no say in the matter and vehemently disagree. It's time to follow Connecticut's lead and tell the idiots in Sacramento to pound sand.

I wonder how many of those millions of citizens were to "busy" to go to vote in elections in the past years. It's amazing how many people wonder how it got this way when they wouldn't cross the street to do anything to stop it.

Voter apathy is definitely a problem, however, I don't think it would make any difference in this case. When the pinheads who's age=IQ outnumber the rational folks 10:1 even if there was 100% turnout it wouldn't make a difference.

The 9th Circuit will uphold the new laws, our best hope at this point is the supreme court and even that's a slim hope.

lfinsr wrote:The problem guys and gals is, this spreads like a cancer. The battle needs to begin here and now instead of allowing it to spread here. As mentioned earlier, the state is governed by the population centers. There are literally millions of citizens there affected by this who had no say in the matter and vehemently disagree. It's time to follow Connecticut's lead and tell the idiots in Sacramento to pound sand.