(B)(iii) is the key: "in a conspicuous manner clearly visible to the public."barres wrote:I understand your logic KBCraig, but where in the law does it state that the entrance has to be posted?
I was thinking this way about a Taco Cabana argument on another board where a compliant 30.06 sign was posted behind the counter. If it was not at the entrance it doesn't count, right? But the Penal Code doesn't say it must be posted at the entrance(s). At least not that I have found.
PC 30.06
(B) a sign posted on the property that:
(i) includes the language described by Paragraph (A) in both
English and Spanish;
(ii) appears in contrasting colors with block letters at least
one inch in height; and
(iii) is displayed in a conspicuous manner clearly visible to
the public.
There is no requirement that it be posted at the entrance(s). But since the purpose of a 30.06 notice is to prevent entry by an armed CHL, it makes little sense to have notices anywhere else.
I've never said that any/all entrances must be posted. I said that someone who enters without passing a 30.06 notice has not received sufficient notice that they may not enter.Unless you can show me elsewhere in PC30.06 or other sections of Texas law that it states that the sign must be at any/all entrances.
Do you believe someone who randomly enters through an unmarked entrance, having not passed by any other conspicuous and clearly visible 30.06 notices, would be guilty of trespass just because all other entrances are conspicuously posted? I'm pretty sure you don't.
I did say that someone who went "entrance shopping" to get around 30.06 notices could probably be convicted.
Kevin